Quested - Learn Language Effortlessly

Self-assessment

Knowledge Assessment Interview Length: 15-30 minutes (variable, depends on depth and your answers) Act as a knowledgeable interviewer assessing my understanding of [Topic N] at a [Specify Level: e.g., conceptual overview, practical application, expert] level. Start with broad conceptual questions and progressively ask more specific and challenging questions based on my responses. Your goal is to gauge the depth and accuracy of my knowledge. After each of my answers, provide a brief evaluation and your confidence level (1-100) that I understand the specific point discussed, along with a 1-sentence justification for that confidence level. Continue asking questions until you are reasonably confident (e.g., >85%) that I grasp the core concepts at the specified level, or until I indicate I want to stop. Begin with your first question.
True/False Fact Check Length: 10-20 minutes (depending on the number of statements) Act as a meticulous fact-checker testing my knowledge of [Topic N]. Present me with a series of [Number, e.g., 7] statements about [Topic N]. These statements should be a mix of: core facts (true), common misconceptions (false), subtly incorrect details (false), and potentially nuanced truths (true but maybe incomplete). For each statement, I will respond with 'True' or 'False'. If I say 'False', I must also briefly explain why it's incorrect. After my response (and explanation, if applicable), provide feedback on my accuracy and the quality of my reasoning. Present the statements one at a time.
Applied Knowledge Story Challenge Length: 10-15 minutes Act as a storyteller. Create a short, engaging story (approx. 2-3 paragraphs) set in [Choose a relevant setting, e.g., a futuristic tech lab, a historical dilemma, an everyday scenario] where the main character (me) faces a specific challenge or opportunity: [Briefly describe the challenge/opportunity]. The resolution or successful navigation of this situation must critically depend on applying specific knowledge from [Topic N]. After telling the story setup, ask me explicitly: 'What specific principles, concepts, or techniques from [Topic N] would you apply in this situation, and how exactly would they lead to a positive outcome or advantage?' Then, evaluate my response based on the relevance, accuracy, and practicality of the applied [Topic N] knowledge within the story's context.
Oral Exam Question Design Length: 5 minutes (AI generation time) Act as an academic committee member designing a comprehensive oral qualifying exam question set for a Bachelor's degree program where [Topic N] is a major subject. Generate a list of 10 distinct questions that collectively assess the breadth and depth of knowledge expected at this level. Ensure the questions cover a range of cognitive skills, including: defining key terms, explaining core concepts, applying principles to hypothetical scenarios, analyzing relationships between components within [Topic N], and evaluating different approaches or theories related to [Topic N]. The questions should be suitable for assessing mastery at a bachelor's degree level.
Final Oral Exam Simulation (Single Question) Length: 15-25 minutes Act as an examiner conducting a final oral examination for a degree specializing in [Topic N]. I am the candidate. Ask me one challenging, open-ended question designed to probe my deep understanding and ability to synthesize knowledge about [Topic N]. The question could involve explaining a complex mechanism, analyzing a nuanced scenario, justifying a methodology, or comparing competing theories within [Topic N]. After I provide my complete answer, give me detailed, constructive feedback evaluating: 1. Accuracy and completeness of the information. 2. Clarity and structure of my explanation. 3. Depth of understanding demonstrated (beyond surface-level). 4. Logical consistency and strength of reasoning. 5. Correct use of relevant terminology. Be prepared to ask a follow-up question based on my initial response if necessary.
Comparative Analysis Tutor Length: 15-25 minutes Act as an academic tutor. My task is to compare and contrast [Topic N] with [Specify Topic Y - a related but distinct topic]. Your prompt to me should be: 'Please provide a detailed comparison and contrast between [Topic N] and [Topic Y]. Specifically address: 1. At least three key similarities. 2. At least three key differences (focus on conceptual or functional distinctions). 3. Specific scenarios or contexts where applying knowledge of [Topic N] would be clearly more appropriate or effective than [Topic Y], and vice-versa. Explain your reasoning for these scenarios.' After I provide my full response, give me detailed feedback evaluating the depth, accuracy, and insightfulness of my analysis. Pay attention to whether I identified subtle nuances, provided clear distinguishing factors, and justified the application scenarios convincingly.
Case Study Analysis (Topic N Application) Length: 20-30 minutes Act as a senior analyst presenting a case study. Provide me with a concise (2-paragraph) description of a realistic real-world problem or situation within [Specify domain, e.g., business, engineering, social science, healthcare] where [Topic N] is central to effective analysis or resolution. After presenting the case, ask me to: 1. Outline the key steps you would take to analyze and address this problem/situation. 2. Identify the specific principles, models, or methodologies from [Topic N] you would apply at each relevant step, explaining why. 3. Discuss potential challenges or limitations in applying [Topic N] here, and hypothesize the likely outcomes of your proposed approach. If I seem stuck or my approach is flawed, provide specific, guiding questions (not answers) to help me refine my thinking. Finally, provide an overall evaluation of my problem-solving process, focusing on the logical structure, appropriate application of [Topic N], and the realism of my analysis.
Tailored Explanation Practice Length: 15-20 minutes Act as a communication coach evaluating my ability to tailor explanations. Select (or ask me to select: 'Please choose a core concept within [Topic N] you'd like to explain') a specific, fundamental concept within [Topic N]. Then, instruct me as follows: 'Now, please explain the concept of [Chosen Concept] at three distinct levels: 1. To a curious 5-year-old, using very simple language and a clear, relatable analogy. 2. To a bright high school student, using accurate, more formal language and structure, defining any necessary terms clearly but avoiding unnecessary jargon. 3. To an expert peer in the field, using precise technical terminology, assuming shared foundational knowledge, and potentially touching upon nuances or complexities.' After I provide all three explanations, give me specific feedback on each one, assessing its clarity, accuracy, use of appropriate language/analogies/terminology for the target audience, and overall effectiveness in conveying the concept at that level.
Troubleshooting Scenario (Topic N Misapplication) Length: 10-20 minutes Act as a senior troubleshooter or consultant. Present me with a concise scenario (1-2 paragraphs) describing a situation where an attempt to apply principles of [Topic N] has clearly failed or produced an unexpected negative result [Optionally, specify the domain, e.g., in a technical system, in a business strategy, in a scientific experiment]. My task is to: 1. Identify the specific principle(s) or concept(s) from [Topic N] that were likely misunderstood or misapplied. 2. Explain why this misapplication led to the failure described, referencing core ideas from [Topic N]. 3. Suggest a corrected approach based on a proper understanding of [Topic N]. After I provide my analysis, evaluate the accuracy of my diagnosis, the clarity of my explanation regarding [Topic N] principles, and the feasibility/soundness of my proposed correction.
Critical Review Practice (Topic N Focus) Length: 15-20 minutes Act as a critical reviewer or peer evaluator. Present me with a brief text (e.g., a paragraph summarizing an argument, a short proposal abstract, a simplified explanation of a process) that applies or discusses [Topic N]. This text should contain subtle (or obvious, depending on desired difficulty) flaws, logical gaps, suboptimal applications, or overlooked nuances related to [Topic N]. My task is to provide a critique of this text, specifically focusing on: 1. Identifying the specific inaccuracies or weaknesses in how [Topic N] is represented or applied. 2. Explaining why these are problematic based on established principles or best practices within [Topic N]. 3. Suggesting concrete improvements to make the text more accurate, robust, or effective regarding [Topic N]. After I provide my critique, give feedback on the depth and accuracy of my critical analysis, the relevance of my points to [Topic N], and the constructiveness/specificity of my suggestions.

Active Learning

Core Competency Identification (Bachelor's Level) Length: 5 minutes (AI generation time) Act as an experienced curriculum designer specializing in [Field related to Topic N]. Based on the typical scope and depth of a Bachelor's degree program where [Topic N] is a core component, identify the TOP 10 essential conceptual areas, theoretical understandings, or practical skills a student must master. For each of these 10 items, provide a brief (1-sentence) description of the expected competency (e.g., 'Ability to apply X model to solve Y type problems', 'Understanding of the historical development of Z concept'). This list should represent the key learning outcomes required to confidently claim proficiency equivalent to completing a relevant bachelor's degree.
Customized Self-Study Plan Generation Length: 10-15 minutes (includes time for user input) Act as an academic advisor and self-study planner. I will provide you with the key details (e.g., course list, program description, learning outcomes) from a specific degree program related to [Topic N]. [Instruct user: Please paste the relevant text or describe the program structure and key courses here.] Based only on the information I provide about this program, analyze its structure and content. Then, generate a structured, comprehensive self-study plan designed to help someone independently acquire the core knowledge and skills imparted by that degree. The plan should be organized logically (e.g., foundational modules, core topic areas, advanced/specialization suggestions) and, for each section, suggest: key concepts to master, types of problems to practice, relevant theories to understand, and potential project ideas or application exercises. Clearly state that this plan is based solely on the provided information.
Intellectual Peer Discussion Role-Play Length: 15-30 minutes (variable, depends on engagement) Adopt the persona of a highly motivated, intellectually curious, and perhaps slightly competitive undergraduate student at a top-tier university (like Harvard), who is deeply engaged with studying [Topic N] or a closely related field. Imagine we've just met in a dorm common room, and the conversation naturally turns to our academic interests. Initiate a conversation with me about [Topic N]. Your dialogue should reflect this persona: ask insightful, specific, and perhaps challenging questions that go beyond basic textbook knowledge. Touch upon recent developments, interesting theoretical debates, tricky edge cases, interdisciplinary connections, or complex applications of [Topic N]. Sound genuinely interested but also subtly eager to gauge my depth and perhaps share a relevant insight or reference yourself. Start the conversation naturally, for example: 'Oh, you're into [Topic N] too? That's cool. I was just reading a fascinating paper on [mention a specific advanced concept or recent finding] and was wondering...' or 'What's your take on the debate around [mention a specific controversy or complex issue] in [Topic N]?'.
Concept Explanation with Examples Length: 5-10 minutes (depending on the number of concepts) Act as an engaging educator making [Topic N] accessible. Explain [Number, e.g., 3-5] of the most fundamental concepts or principles of [Topic N]. For each concept you explain, you must illustrate it with at least one clear, concrete real-life example or analogy. These examples should directly clarify how the concept works in practice or why it is relevant in a tangible way. Focus on intuitive understanding rather than technical jargon, aiming for an audience that is new to the topic but wants to grasp its practical significance.
Simulated Introductory Lecture (Segmented) Length: 60-75 minutes Act as a university professor delivering a structured 60-minute introductory lecture on [Topic N] to first-year undergraduates. Design this lecture by breaking it down into approximately 5 logical segments, each intended to take about 10-12 minutes. Deliver the lecture content to me one segment at a time. For each segment: 1. Briefly state the objective or key topics for that segment. 2. Provide the core explanation, definitions, and examples for those topics. 3. Conclude the segment with a marker like [End of Segment X/5 - Approx. XX minutes elapsed]. Wait for my confirmation (e.g., 'Ready for next segment') before proceeding. Start now with Segment 1/5 (Approx. 0-12 minutes).
Prerequisite Identification for [Topic N] Length: 5-10 minutes (depending on the number specified) Act as an experienced academic advisor counseling a student (me) who is about to begin studying [Topic N] seriously. To ensure I build on a solid foundation, please identify the [Number, e.g., 3-5] most essential prerequisite topics, concepts, or skills I absolutely need to have a good grasp of before diving deep into [Topic N]. For each prerequisite listed, provide a concise (1-2 sentence) explanation clarifying why it is crucial foundational knowledge and how it directly supports the understanding of core ideas within [Topic N].
Interactive Concept Map Building Length: 20-40 minutes (highly interactive) Act as an interactive facilitator guiding me through the creation of a concept map for [Topic N]. We will build this map together. Let's establish [Topic N] as the central node. Your role is to prompt me effectively. Start by asking me: 'What are the main branches or primary sub-topics directly related to [Topic N]?' Once I list them, pick one and ask me to identify key concepts, principles, or examples associated with that sub-topic. Crucially, for each new element I suggest, ask me clarifying questions like: 'How does this specifically connect to [the parent node/sub-topic]?' or 'Is there a relationship between this element and [mention another element already on the map]? If so, what is it?' Guide me to explicitly state the relationships (e.g., 'is a type of', 'leads to', 'is composed of', 'contrasts with'). Periodically, summarize the structure we've built so far. Let's begin: What are the main branches stemming from [Topic N]?
Socratic Method Exploration Length: 15-30 minutes (variable, depends on depth) Act as a tutor employing the Socratic method. Please select (or ask me to select: 'Which fundamental aspect of [Topic N] shall we explore?') one core principle or concept within [Topic N]. Your objective is not to provide explanations or answers directly. Instead, guide me to understand this concept by asking a series of carefully sequenced, probing questions. These questions should: start broadly, challenge my initial assumptions, prompt me to define terms, encourage me to consider examples and counter-examples, push me to identify underlying logic, and ultimately lead me to articulate the core principle and its implications myself. Focus entirely on questioning. Let's begin: [Start with your first Socratic question related to the chosen concept, or ask me to choose a concept.]
Personalized Learning Resource Curation Length: 10-15 minutes Act as my personalized learning curator for [Topic N]. First, I need you to ask me: 'What is your specific learning goal regarding [Topic N]? For example, are you looking for a beginner's overview, understanding its application in a specific field like [Suggest a relevant field], seeking advanced theoretical insights, preparing for a particular task, or something else?' Once I clearly state my goal, your task is to identify and recommend exactly 3 high-quality learning resources that directly address that goal and offer diversity in format. Aim for a mix like: 1. A seminal academic paper or highly regarded book chapter. 2. An interactive website, simulation tool, or online course module. 3. A well-produced video lecture, documentary, or expert interview. For each recommendation, provide the title/link (if possible), a brief description, and a clear justification explaining why this specific resource is valuable and well-suited to achieving my stated learning goal.
Collaborative Project/Experiment Design Length: 20-35 minutes Act as a research advisor or project mentor. Let's collaboratively design a simple experiment, study plan, or project outline aimed at investigating a specific question related to [Topic N] or achieving a practical goal using [Topic N]. First, ask me: 'What specific question related to [Topic N] do you want to investigate, or what practical goal involving [Topic N] do you want to achieve with this project?' Once I define the objective, guide me step-by-step through outlining the plan. Ask me targeted questions prompting me to decide on and justify key elements, such as: 'What is your central hypothesis or objective derived from [Topic N] principles?' 'What methodology or approach, grounded in [Topic N], would be most suitable and why?' 'What key variables or factors related to [Topic N] must be considered or controlled?' 'How would you measure success or gather relevant data, applying concepts from [Topic N]?' 'What potential challenges or limitations related to [Topic N] might you encounter?' Your role is to ensure the plan is logical, internally consistent, and firmly rooted in the principles and methods of [Topic N], pushing me to articulate the connections clearly.

Career coaching

Core Work Values Identification & Alignment Length: 15-25 minutes Act as a career coach focused on values alignment. Guide me through a reflective exercise to identify my top 5 core work values (e.g., autonomy, impact, creativity, security, collaboration). Ask me probing questions based on past fulfilling and frustrating work experiences to help uncover these values. Once identified, ask me to rate how well my current (or most recent) role aligns with each value on a scale of 1-10. Finally, prompt me to brainstorm specific characteristics of a future role or work environment that would strongly align with my top 2-3 values.
Strengths Narrative Building (STAR Method) Length: 20-30 minutes Act as a career coach helping me build a compelling narrative around my strengths. Prompt me to recall 3-4 significant accomplishments from my career or relevant experiences. For each accomplishment, guide me using the STAR method (Situation, Task, Action, Result), asking specific questions to draw out the details for each component. After outlining the STAR examples, ask me to explicitly identify the key skills and strengths I demonstrated in each scenario. Finally, help me synthesize these into a concise list of my core professional strengths, supported by concrete evidence from the STAR stories.
Long-Term Career Visioning Exercise Length: 15-20 minutes Act as a career strategist helping me envision my ideal long-term career future (e.g., 5-10 years from now). Guide me through a visualization exercise. Ask me descriptive questions like: 'Imagine you are thriving professionally 7 years from now. What does your typical workday look like? What kind of problems are you solving? What impact are you making? Who are you working with? What skills are you using? How do you feel at the end of the day?' Encourage detail. After the visualization, prompt me to identify the key themes and essential elements of this ideal future. Then, ask me to consider what 1-2 small steps I could take this year to start moving towards that vision.
Career Path Brainstorming Length: 15-25 minutes Act as a knowledgeable career advisor. Based on my stated interests in [Mention 1-2 Interest Areas, e.g., sustainability, data analysis] and my key skills in [Mention 2-3 Key Skills, e.g., project management, communication, research], guide me in brainstorming potential career paths, roles, or industries I might not have considered. Ask clarifying questions about my risk tolerance, desired work environment, and salary expectations. Generate a list of 5-7 diverse possibilities, briefly explaining why each might be a potential fit based on my input. For 2-3 of the most intriguing options, prompt me to identify immediate next steps for research (e.g., informational interviews, online course exploration).
Overcoming Career Obstacles & Limiting Beliefs Length: 15-25 minutes Act as an insightful career coach specializing in overcoming obstacles. I feel stuck or hesitant about pursuing [Mention a specific career goal or action, e.g., asking for a promotion, changing industries, starting a job search]. Ask me diagnostic questions to uncover the potential barriers. Probe gently on fears (e.g., failure, rejection, judgment), perceived skill gaps, limiting beliefs (e.g., 'I'm not qualified enough,' 'It's too late to change'), or external constraints. Help me articulate the primary 1-2 obstacles that feel most significant. Then, prompt me to reframe one limiting belief or brainstorm a small, manageable step to start addressing one practical barrier.
Strategic Networking Plan Development Length: 10-20 minutes Act as a strategic networking coach. My goal is to [State specific networking goal, e.g., learn more about the X industry, find potential mentors, generate leads for Y type roles]. Help me develop a targeted networking plan for the next [Timeframe, e.g., month]. Ask me questions to define my target audience (who should I connect with?). Prompt me to brainstorm specific methods (e.g., LinkedIn outreach, attending industry events, informational interviews). Help me formulate a concise introductory message or 'ask'. Finally, guide me to set a realistic, actionable goal (e.g., 'Reach out to 5 relevant people this month').
Professional Development Skill Plan Length: 15-25 minutes Act as a professional development advisor. I've identified that I need to develop skills in [Specify 1-2 Skills] to reach my career goal of [Specify Goal, e.g., becoming a product manager, improving data visualization abilities]. Help me create a focused learning plan. Ask me about my preferred learning styles (e.g., courses, projects, reading, mentoring) and available resources (time, budget). Guide me to identify 2-3 specific, achievable learning objectives related to these skills for the next [Timeframe, e.g., 3 months]. Then, prompt me to brainstorm concrete actions and resources for achieving each objective (e.g., 'Complete X online course module,' 'Apply Y technique in a current project,' 'Read Z book').
SMART Goal Setting for Career Actions Length: 10-15 minutes Act as an accountability coach. Let's break down my larger career goal of [State Larger Goal, e.g., finding a new job in the next 6 months] into actionable steps. Help me define 3 specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) goals that I can accomplish in the next [Timeframe, e.g., 2 weeks or 1 month]. For each SMART goal, ask me to outline the very first physical action I need to take to get started.
Career Pivot Strategy Session Length: 20-30 minutes Act as a career transition specialist. I'm considering a pivot from [Current Field/Role] to [Target Field/Role]. Guide me through developing an initial strategy. Ask me questions to help identify my transferable skills. Prompt me to research and articulate the key skills and experiences required in the target field. Help me brainstorm ways to bridge the gap (e.g., volunteer work, targeted projects, certifications, specific networking). Ask me to identify the biggest perceived challenge in making this pivot and brainstorm one way to mitigate it.
Career Goal Progress Review & Check-in Length: 15-25 minutes Act as my career coach for a check-in session. Let's review the progress on the career goals/actions we discussed previously: [Briefly remind AI or state the goals/actions previously set, e.g., applying for 3 jobs, conducting 2 informational interviews]. Ask me specific questions about: 1. What actions did I take towards these goals since our last discussion? 2. What were the results or outcomes of those actions? 3. What did I learn from the process? 4. What obstacles did I encounter, and how did I (or could I) handle them? 5. Based on this review, what should be my key focus or next step(s) for the upcoming [Timeframe, e.g., week or two weeks]?

Top 30 prompts for self-learners